Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon 27. Jul 2015, 03:36
by Craig Frank
Devin,
Thank you for the advice. I have some math to do.
Grant,
Thank you. I'm always attempting new colors. I just ordered a bunch more paracord that I will be using sometime in the future.
Posted: Thu 17. Sep 2015, 19:05
by Ian Moore
Now that I've got posting privileges, I specifically wanted to come here and find this thread, to comment on that handle design. Something about the way it almost ends up looking like multiple interwoven squares totally works for me. I love it.
Posted: Fri 18. Sep 2015, 02:40
by Craig Frank
Ian - thank you. That was actually totally by accident, but I liked it too.
Posted: Fri 18. Sep 2015, 10:09
by Paul Slater
Craig that whip is very nice.
In one respect it just shows how much I have to learn.
At least I know where I am aiming for now at least as before all I had to go from was youtube videos and the odd webpage here and there.
Posted: Fri 18. Sep 2015, 10:46
by Fritz Ehlers
Nice work, I like the handles
but hockey tape makes a bad replacement for sinew, it's quicker to apply, but doesn't give you the same result.
Binding tight with sinew stiffens the transition out of strength and the next layer will be plaited over a tight surface that doesn't give, but hockey tape stiffens it because the transition becomes fat and spongy, which results in differences in tension of plaiting along the whip. You can see that in the picture where you have the whip in the vice and it's squashing the thong together. It gives quite a lot and forces gaps in your work.
A well bound transition with sinew will give you a lot more energy to power the thong forward with a clean action. I've found that with hockey tape it has more of an effect of a fat person with tight jeans trying to tie their shoe-laces ( sorry, I couldn't think of a better analogy)
Posted: Fri 18. Sep 2015, 10:56
by Robert Gage
Craig, I have to agree with Fritz. And Fritz, that's actually a very good analogy!

Posted: Sat 19. Sep 2015, 20:15
by Craig Frank
Fritz - yes, about the hockey tape causing a squishing affect in the vice. However, I actually use both. I wrap the layer in hockey tape and then do a four layer binding in sinew. Lately, I also add another layer of hockey tape over the sinew.
Posted: Sat 19. Sep 2015, 20:17
by Craig Frank
P.S. - the sinew was the same color as the hockey tape. It's hard to see it in the pictures, but it's on the ladies. You can see the two spools on the table.
Posted: Sun 20. Sep 2015, 03:02
by Craig Frank
On the ladies? What the hell was I trying to type?
Posted: Sun 20. Sep 2015, 04:31
by David Cross
Craig, Autocorrect will be the downfall of mankind. I'm sure of it.
I've never used hockey tape. I will admit to a kind of prejudice there, after dealing with e-tape on a few of my whips. I just don't believe any tape can replace a proper binding. I welcome the opportunity to be proven wrong, naturally.
This statement may fly in the face of my beliefs against taping, but...I've discovered that most of my whips get "squashed" in the vise. I rely on my weighted rolling board to smooth it out, but it got me wondering...do I really, necessarily know that I'm plaiting correctly?
The whipmaker has a thousand things to keep track of, all of them important. The only truly effective method is to start with basic knowledge and improvise improvements. Each design takes you further toward your perfect whip.
Posted: Sun 20. Sep 2015, 04:35
by Craig Frank
David - thank you, as always. Yes, I do make sure to roll it until the squished parts are round again. I personally prefer to wrap the layers in hockey tape before the sinew so that I'm wrapping the sinew over a generally smooth surface.
Posted: Sun 20. Sep 2015, 05:40
by Robert Gage
David Cross wrote: The whipmaker has a thousand things to keep track of, all of them important. The only truly effective method is to start with basic knowledge and improvise improvements. Each design takes you further toward your perfect whip.
David, I sometimes remember reading that the great Australian whip-makers like Cecil Henderson all did a rigorous apprenticeship under the eagle eye of a master, lasting several years! Nowadays, very few makers have the advantage of learning their craft under constant expert tutelage. (I've got an idea that Simon Martin did, but I may be wrong.)
Posted: Sun 20. Sep 2015, 06:43
by David Cross
I would have preferred to learn under a master, but those days are long gone. There's just no infrastructure to support it. Everything these days is unions, or corporate-controlled events. The only recourse for the average citizen is DIY.
That's why the internet is so powerful. They'd like nothing better than to keep us all in the dark, but we have The People's Tool to teach us. It's not as potent or powerful as a master, but it's something.
That, and places like WB. They're rare, but useful. The craft lives, despite all efforts to extinguish it.
Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 01:16
by Craig Frank
I think I failed to mention that I entered this whip into the army MWR arts and crafts contest. I just got word this afternoon that I took first place for the entire army in novice textile and fabrics category.
Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 01:35
by Rachel McCollough
WOW congratulations Craig, that's outstanding!!!
Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 02:19
by Taylor Jennings
Outstanding is correct
Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 06:32
by Robert Gage
Thanks to Google, I've just deciphered MWR.
Well done, Craig: many congratulations!

Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 06:46
by Craig Frank
Thank you, everyone. Sorry about that, Robert. To many years of death by acronyms (and PowerPoint).
Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 06:53
by Robert Gage
No need to apologise, Craig. These challenges expand my horizons!

Posted: Wed 23. Sep 2015, 08:57
by Guest
Congratulations, Graig! It's a very special effort to put together a bullwhip out of paracord and I'm not surprised it had appealed to the judges.